Here's a hand from a recent day-time game. Imagine yourself holding this hand: ♠A986543 ♥– ♦72 ♣J432. Nobody is vulnerable and RHO deals and passes. Do you bid 3♠? If you do (I wouldn't) you might just escape for -200. Incidentally, why do I think this is not a good preempt? Because you don't have the ♠Q! Your Ace is likely to win a trick whatever contract you're in. Besides that, partner might have ♠K72 ♥65432 ♦A3 ♣AQ5 and you're odds-on to make 4♠ (you might conceivably take all the tricks on a club lead!) but partner is probably going to pass you out.
So, in any case, you decide to pass. LHO now starts proceedings with a bid of 1♣ (playing standard American more or less). Your partner overcalls 1♥, and RHO now bids 2♦ (natural). Now, do you bid 3♠? Of course not!! There are several reasons why your hand is even less suitable for a preempt now:
- RHO has significantly limited her hand (she passed initially but now shows 10+ with a good diamond suit) – this means that LHO has a very good idea what the total assets of their partnership are and whether to bid on or nail you.
- Your partner has shown good values in hearts, the one suit you don't have. On a bad day (this hand, in fact) you can never even get to dummy to cash partner's two heart tricks)!
The dramatis personae? All I will reveal is that I was "LHO" and my hand was: ♠KQT7 ♥QT97 ♦6 ♣AQ96. I don't think I've ever felt quite so confident about a penalty double of a 3-level bid. The fact that they went on to the four level was a case of Christmas come early!
No comments:
Post a Comment